Dino pisze:A to dlaczego?
PrzecieĹź to ty, Danielu, pierwszy napisaĹeĹ o welafronsie, wiÄc chyba powineneĹ byÄ wpisany jak "wspĂłĹautor".
Napisalem o jego publikacji, ale autorem artykulu jest tylko Sebastian. Poza tym nie zgadzam sie z tekstem, wiec nie chce byc uwazany za jednego z autorow. ;)
Dobra, skoro tak uwaĹźasz
Dino ;)
EDIT 4.1.2008
Wiec mialem racje. Informacje na temat welafronsa trzeba na stronie koniecznie poprawic!
Autorzy na temat "lambeozaura" z Meksyku pisza:
A deep tail not observed in other species of Lambeosaurus defines the species name, laticaudus. However, a similarly deep tail is also present in Hypacrosaurus altispinus (Brown, 1913). In fact, Morris (1981:457) states that, “Were it not for the open narial crest ?L. laticaudus might easily have been called Hypacrosaurus sp. because this latter genus is the only hadrosaurid thought to have a tall, flattened tail.” We consider the taxon ?Lambeosaurus laticaudus to be a nomen dubium because the type specimen does not have any synapomorphies that unambiguously unite it with any lambeosaurine genus. Nor does it possess autapomorphies that would permit erection of a new genus. Based on the similarities of the premaxilla and the deep tail, this taxon may represent the southernmost extent of the genus Hypacrosaurus (see also Evans and Reisz, in press), but any such referral must await discovery of additional material. From this point forward, we refer to ?L. laticaudus as the “Baja lambeosaur.”
Ostatnio zmieniony 2 lutego 2008, o 10:52 przez Daniel Madzia, łącznie zmieniany 1 raz.